kaiyun
全国咨询热线: 010-9960153

新闻中心

新闻中心

扑救率85.2%场均丢球0.57,斯维拉尔两项数据五大联赛门将第一(斯维拉尔以85.2%扑救率和场均0.57失球领跑五大联赛门将)

发布时间:2026-02-09

Responding in Chinese

估可看

I need to respond in Chinese since the user wrote their message that way. Their statement looks like a headline about Mile Svilar, who has impressive save percentages. They didn't ask a question, so it might be good to clarify if they want a summary or more context.

I should explain who he is, his current stats, and that he plays for Roma. This season, he is the starting goalkeeper, and his stats are indeed outstanding in Serie A! I could ask if they'd like a graphic or analysis.Considering network calls and response

自动算扑救

In the CLI harness, network calls might need approval depending on the situation. The instructions say to assume workspace-write and network-enabled status unless told otherwise.

I could propose fetching data from public sources like FBref or StatsBomb, but scraping might be blocked. It's wise to ask if the user wants verification.

and

For my response, I should keep it concise and bullet-pointed. I can affirm the claim with context about Mile Svilar's season. Quick analysis of save percentage and goals allowed per 90 minutes would be helpful, along with some caveats.

Next steps could include checking their latest data, creating a comparison graphic, or sharing a script for regular data retrieval. I need to decide if code examples are necessary!Offering script assistance

Even though the user didn't specifically ask, as a coding agent, offering to write a script is a good next step, but I’ll keep it optional. It’s probably best to first ask what they want to do with the information: verify it, write a post, or visualize the data.

write

I could respond with a congratulatory remark about the interesting stat and provide context on Svilar’s rise and Roma's defense strategy, keeping it brief. I should mention that his leading metrics are impressive while cautioning about sample size and qualifiers. Then, I'll ask if they want me to核查, 做图, or写脚本.

你这是在说罗马门将斯维拉尔本赛季的数据吧:扑救率85.2%、场均丢球0.57,两项均居五大联赛门将第一。确实很亮眼。

几点快速解读

if

  • 扑救率高+丢球少同时领先很罕见,但强烈受样本量、出场时间与对手射门质量影响(是否含点球、是否设定≥900/1000分钟门槛等)。
  • 更全面的评估可看PSxG-GA(扑救增值)、禁区内/外扑救拆分、传球出球与高空球处理等,避免仅靠两项门线指标得出结论。
  • 罗马战术与防线质量也会显著影响门将数据(被迫扑救的难度、防区控制)。

需要我做什么?

  1. 我帮你核对最新权威来源(Opta/FBref/WhoScored)的实时排名与分钟门槛。
  2. 做一张与其他顶级门将(阿利松、迈尼昂、奥布拉克、多纳鲁马等)的对比图表。
  3. 写个小脚本定期抓取五大联赛门将榜单,自动算扑救率、丢球/90、PSxG-GA并输出排行榜。
    选个编号就行,或者告诉我你想要的门槛/赛段(联赛/各项赛事、是否剔除点球)。